Sunday, October 25, 2015

Standardized Testing Gone Wild: Hangover Edition

Obama Administration Calls For Limits On Testing In Schools:

Faced with mounting and bipartisan opposition to increased and often high-stakes testing in the nation’s public schools, the Obama administration declared Saturday that the push had gone too far, acknowledged its own role in the proliferation of tests, and urged schools to step back and make exams less onerous and more purposeful.

Specifically, the administration called for a cap on assessment so that no child would spend more than 2 percent of classroom instruction time taking tests. It called on Congress to “reduce over-testing” as it reauthorizes the federal legislation governing the nation’s public elementary and secondary schools.
My first reaction to the headline was "Lolz" followed by, wtf took you so long? Two percent would be a MAJOR reduction in testing (my kids take so many tests, benchmarks, scantrons and other b.s., there is little to no time left for instruction). 

And it shouldn't be just limits on testing, but on prepping for the tests (i.e. teaching to the test). My kids spend virtually all of their time in class and on homework getting ready for the "next measurement of progress." Which, of course, isn't's regress.

Predictably, the "get tough with tests" Eraserheads are pushing back.
Some who agreed that testing has run rampant also urged the administration not to throw out the No. 2 pencils with the bath water, saying tests can be a powerful tool for schools to identify weaknesses and direct resources. They worried that the cap on time spent testing — which the administration said it would ask Congress to enshrine in legislation — would only tangle schools in more federal regulations and questions of what, exactly, counts as a test.

“What happens if somebody puts a cap on testing, and to meet the cap ends up eliminating tests that could actually be helpful, or leaves the redundancy in the test and gets rid of a test that teachers can use to inform their instruction?” asked Michael Casserly, the executive director of the Council of the Great City Schools, an organization that represents about 70 large urban school districts.

Michael J. Petrilli, the president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and one of the most vocal proponents for higher standards and tougher tests, said, “There’s plenty of agreement that there’s too much testing going on.” But, he added, “we have to be careful, as with anything federal, that it doesn’t lead to unintended consequences.”
Yeah, like fewer tests. Other than that, there are no unintended consequences for getting rid of our rat-psychology obsession with standardized testing (save this one little fact: billions of dollars would be lost to private testing companies).

But the most galling part of this announcement is the way the Obama administration is saying we're all responsible for this mess.
“I still have no question that we need to check at least once a year to make sure our kids are on track or identify areas where they need support,” said Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, who has announced that he will leave office in December. “But I can’t tell you how many conversations I’m in with educators who are understandably stressed and concerned about an overemphasis on testing in some places and how much time testing and test prep are taking from instruction.”

“It’s important that we’re all honest with ourselves,” he continued. “At the federal, state and local level, we have all supported policies that have contributed to the problem in implementation. We can and will work with states, districts and educators to help solve it.”
Uh, no. "We all" have not supported these policies. Just on this blog alone I can assure you I've been ranting against NCLB and the sociopathic emphasis on standardized testing since we went live in 2007. And prior to that, in the classroom, since NCLB was passed in 2001 (even before that, when Georgia was "pioneering" this nonsense in the late 90's).

Standardized tests measure nothing more than your test taking ability. Period. The research has been in on that for over decade. And while it's nice to have Arne's support of rolling back some of the testing, until the social control elements are removed from the public classrooms, nothing is going to change. 

Expect the push back from the standardized test industrial complex to be fierce.

No comments: