Friday, June 26, 2015


Same Sex Marriage is a Right, Court Rules 5-4:

In a long-sought victory for the gay rights movement, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage.
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in the 5 to 4 decision. He was joined by the court’s four more liberal justices.

The decision, the culmination of decades of litigation and activism, came against the backdrop of fast-moving changes in public opinion, with polls indicating that most Americans now approve of same-sex marriage.
Justice Kennedy said gay and lesbian couples had a fundamental right to marry.
“No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family,” he wrote. “In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were.”

“It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage,” Justice Kennedy said of the couples challenging state bans on same-sex marriage. “Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”
Kennedy's words are truly eloquent. I wonder how many straight people who have f'd up their own marriages read those passages above and hung their heads in shame (and if they didn't, they should).

Those who will resist this decision, which has basically been inevitable for several years now, will no doubt hang on the words of the dissenters. Roberts actually has some valid concerns regarding religion and legislative interpretation; the others, not so much.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., in a dissent joined by Justice Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, said the Constitution had nothing to say on the subject.

“If you are among the many Americans — of whatever sexual orientation — who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote. “Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.”

In a second dissent, Justice Scalia mocked Justice Kennedy’s soaring language. “The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic,” Justice Scalia wrote of his colleague’s work. “Of course the opinion’s showy profundities are often profoundly incoherent.”
Because if anyone knows pretentiousness, egotism and incoherence, it's El Nino. Just "ask the nearest hippie."

Anyway, it's the law of the land as of today. Now watch the divorce lawyers rub their hands together in glee.

The case is Oberegefell v. Hodges (2015)

Next up: SCOTUSinjection on Monday. Will the court ban lethal injection, and possibly the death penalty itself? Jiggery-pokery, right?

No comments: