Monday, September 30, 2013

They're Magically Delicious

Creationists on Texas Panel for Biology Textbooks:
One is a nutritionist who believes “creation science” based on biblical principles should be taught in the classroom. Another is a chemical engineer who is listed as a “Darwin Skeptic” on the Web site of the Creation Science Hall of Fame. A third is a trained biologist who also happens to be a fellow of the Discovery Institute, the Seattle-based center of the intelligent-design movement and a vice president at an evangelical ministry in Plano, Tex.

As Texas gears up to select biology textbooks for use by high school students over the next decade, the panel responsible for reviewing submissions from publishers has stirred controversy because a number of its members do not accept evolution and climate change as scientific truth. 

In the state whose governor, Rick Perry, boasted as a candidate for president that his schools taught both creationism and evolution, the State Board of Education, which includes members who hold creationist views, helped nominate several members of the textbook review panel. Others were named by parents and educators. Prospective candidates could also nominate themselves. The state’s education commissioner, Michael L. Williams, a Perry appointee and a conservative Republican, made the final appointments to the 28-member panel. Six of them are known to reject evolution.
[Checks calendar] Yep, still 2013, not 1913.
Publishers including well-known companies like Pearson, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and McGraw-Hill submitted 14 biology textbooks for consideration this year. Reports from the review panels have been sent to publishers, who can now make changes. Mr. Williams will review the changes and recommend books to the state board. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Williams repeatedly declined requests for an interview. The state board will vote on a final approved list of textbooks in November. 

The reports contained comments from Karen Beathard, a senior lecturer in the department of nutrition and food science at Texas A&M University, who wrote in a review of a textbook submitted by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt that “Students should have the opportunity to use their critical thinking skills to weigh the evidence between evolution and ‘creation science.’ ” 
Er...what? That's like saying "I want students to use their critical thinking skills to weigh the evidence between the theory of gravity and leprechauns." Or between the theory of relativitiy and unicorns (because remember: evolution, gravity and relativity are all "just theories").
By questioning the science — often getting down to very technical details — the evolution challengers in Texas are following a strategy increasingly deployed by others around the country. 

There is little open talk of creationism. Instead they borrow buzzwords common in education, “critical thinking,” saying there is simply not enough evidence to prove evolution. 

If textbooks do not present alternative viewpoints or explain what they describe as “the controversy,” they say students will be deprived of a core concept of education — learning how to make up their own minds. 
Funny, I wonder if Texas officials would be ok with students "thinking critically" and "making up their own minds" about sex (abstinence only)? Or guns (stand your ground)? Or abortion (illegal)?

The worst part of this story? That some of the publishers are actually considering changing their presentation on evolution in order to score a contract.
The publishers are considering changes. A spokeswoman for Pearson said that the publisher had made some adjustments but that they “did not compromise the integrity of the science.” She added, “Our book has always been honest that evolutionary biologists don’t have all the answers nor does evolution provide all the answers.” 
I can tell you one thing after reading that: I may never use another Pearson text again. What an outrage. To compromise the integrity of science by saying it "doesn't have all the answers" is beyond stupid. What academic discipline has "all the answers" or even purports to? And what's that got to do with science versus fiction or dogma?

Anyway, glad to know we're still fighting them "monkey trials" in the south, all these years later. They keep stripping everything out of public education except math and science, and now even the science you get is dumbed down and ideologically driven. 

Next up: "y'all make up your own mind about this algebra nonsense."

Don't mess with...stupid.

No comments: